US to Play Bigger Role in Global Economic Recovery

The forces driving the global economy are changing.  We expect the US economy to take on a bigger role in the global recovery in 2012, while growth in emerging markets decelerates from the fast pace in 2011.

That may sound like a funny assessment given the endless infighting in Washington over fiscal policy. But the US economy is in better shape than you might think. US manufacturing is relatively strong and exports continue to boom. We’ve also recently seen positive reports on employment, retail sales, capital spending and housing. US consumer spending is starting to pick up, and even the moribund US construction sector is showing signs of life, with the first increase in private construction spending since 2005.

All these things lead me to project that US gross domestic product (GDP) will grow by 3% in 2012—higher than the consensus estimate of 2.2%. That may not sound so fast by historical standards, but it’s the first time that the pace of US economic growth is exceeding the global average since the global economic recovery began in mid-2009.

In emerging markets, growth continues to slow. Real GDP growth has come down from 8.0% in 2010 to an estimated 6.3% this year. This trend is likely to continue through 2012, when we forecast emerging market growth of 5.3%, with slowdowns in Asia, Latin America and central and Eastern Europe. In most cases, growth is moderating and is unlikely to collapse.

Central banks are responding; we expect a string of monetary policy moves in emerging economies. In China, the recent cut in the reserve requirement came earlier than expected. We think that’s a harbinger for an official rate cut within the next three months. Rates in Brazil are also likely to come down.

Of course, the wild card next year is Europe. In our view, the European debt crisis is now acting as a brake on the global economic recovery, but it isn’t likely to trigger a global downturn.

This view assumes that European Union policymakers will agree on a plan to promote and enforce greater fiscal discipline among the member’s countries, which in time would pave the way for the European Central Bank (ECB) to take on a more active role in the debt markets. Recently announced fiscal actions in Italy and the attendant sharp fall in bond yields is a hopeful sign that some progress is being made.

In Europe, we now expect real GDP to contract by 0.5% versus last month’s estimate of a 0.1% decline. This has prompted us to slightly lower our estimates for global economic growth in 2012 to 2.6%, down from last month’s estimate of 2.8%.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AllianceBernstein portfolio-management teams.

Joseph G. Carson is Director—Global Economic Research at AllianceBernstein.

 

 

 

Joseph G. Carson

Joseph G. Carson joined AB in 2001. He oversees the Gobal Economic Research group, which provides economic analysis for the firm, and has primary responsibility for economic and interest-rate analysis of the US. Previously, he was chief economist of the Americas for UBS Warburg . Over the years, he has also served as the chief US economist at Deutsche Bank, as chief economist at Chemical Bank and Dean Witter, and as senior economist at Merrill Lynch. Carson began his professional career in 1977 as a staff economist in the US Department of Commerce and represented the department at the Council on Wage and Price Stability during President Carter’s voluntary wage and price guidelines program. Early in his career, he also held a variety of roles at General Motors. Carson was named to the Institutional Investor All-Star Team for Fixed Income while at Deutsche Bank, He received his BA and MA from Youngstown State University and did his PhD coursework at George Washington University. Location: New York

Related Posts

2 thoughts on “How Much Will Fed Tightening Hurt?

  1. I am confused after reading your article. I invest in high-yield open-end mutual funds and also in cef”s. I have always believed that as interest rates rise the nav of an open-end fund usually drops as does the price of a cef. If the share prices drop and the monthly distribution stays the same (or even goes up because rates are going up) then you are able to buy more shares for less money which would give you a higher monthly income. If I am missing something please clearify.

    Thanks.

    • Hello Ted,

      Your understanding of the impact of rising interest rates on these types of investments is accurate. It’s also right in line with what we explained in the blog about the likely short- and long-term effects of an immediate end to the Fed’s policies. As we said in the article, rising interest rates would at first push down bond prices and hurt returns in the short term, but would also increase expected returns from income later.

Comments are closed.