In Defense of Commodity Futures

Several prominent pension funds have slashed their commodity futures investments for delivering poor returns with higher volatility than usual, while failing to diversify equity exposures as expected, The Wall Street Journal recently reported. If inflation rises, they may regret it.

Our research shows that commodity futures have performed poorly in recent years for two reasons that we’ve seen before: new technology has disrupted pricing for key commodities, and fears of deflation, rather than inflation, have dominated the market for much of the last five years. We don’t expect either condition to last.

Commodity future indices have been and are likely to remain highly sensitive inflation hedges that provide their benefits in periods when they are  needed most—when rising inflation depresses stock and bond returns. 

Thus, we think many investors would benefit from a strategic allocation to a diversified set of real assets that includes commodity futures.

Technology Drove Poor Returns

Investor dismay with the returns from commodity futures in recent years is understandable. The annualized return of the Dow Jones-UBS Commodity Index (DJ-UBSCI), which reflects a broad basket of commodities, was seven percentage points below inflation, as measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI), over the five years ending in December 2012. By contrast, the index’s annualized returns were five percentage points above inflation in the 17 years ending in December 2007.

Like all risk assets, commodities futures indices traded down sharply during the financial crisis in 2008. Their failure to rebound with stocks, high-yield bonds and some types of real estate in the subsequent years can be traced to very poor returns for two futures contracts: WTI Crude Oil (down 16.1% a year, annualized for five years) and Natural Gas (down 41.1% a year!).

Why? Technology is the enemy of commodities. In this case, the introduction of hydraulic fracturing, horizontal drilling and other technologies that sparked the US shale revolution drove oil and gas supplies up—and returns for the futures contracts down.

We expect returns for oil and gas futures to normalize as end-market demand increases to absorb the new supply and storage and distribution infrastructure for oil and gas improves. Industry is already relocating to the US and US utilities are converting from coal to gas-fired turbines to take advantage of low US natural gas prices. In addition, discussions are underway about building crude oil pipelines to coastal refineries, in order to to ease exports of refined products.

Overall, we expect the annualized returns of broad commodity indices to normalize at around CPI plus 2% over the long term, with much of the 2% real return coming from passive rebalancing within the index.

High Correlations when Inflation Low

The correlation of the DJ-UBSCI to the S&P 500 has also been disappointing: It rose to +0.5 in the past five years from essentially zero  from 1992 to 2007. In part, this jump mirrors the higher correlations across risk assets during and after the financial crisis. But the jump in correlations also reflects expectations of bouts of deflation within a long period of low inflation. Historically, such expectations have led to negative short-term returns for stocks and commodities, and strong positive returns for bonds.

The display below shows the relationship between long-term inflation expectations and the correlation between commodity and stock index returns over trailing one-year periods. The blue squares show that over the past five years, long-term expected inflation was quite low (in the 1% to 2% range) and the correlation between the DJ-UBSCI and the S&P 500 was high (mostly between 0.4 and 0.6). The green diamonds show that from 1992 to 2007, inflation expectations were in the normal range (2% to 4%) and the correlation between the stock market and commodity indices was either low or negative. 

 Commodities Diversify Equities Wjen Expected Inflation Is Higher

We expect the correlation between equities and commodities to fall as inflation expectations normalize. That is, we expect commodity index investments to provide diversification benefits when they are needed—when fear of inflation hurts returns for both equities and bonds.

Commodities Are Inflation Sensitive

Many investors confuse “real” or inflation-adjusted returns with inflation sensitivity. Equities have had high real returns over the long term. But over shorter time periods, equities, like bonds, tend to react negatively when long-term inflation expectations rise above, say, 3%.

Commodities have had lower real returns than equities over the long term but have reacted positively to expectations of higher inflation. That’s a rare and valuable trait for investors whose liabilities grow with inflation—including retirees, foundations and endowments, and pension funds that pay benefits with cost-of-living adjustments.

We don’t expect commodity futures indices to deliver high returns in the near term, but we do expect their returns and volatility to normalize, offering significant benefits as an inflation hedge.

That said, commodity futures indices aren’t the only or necessarily the best form of inflation protection. In our next post, we will discuss two others—real estate and shares of commodity-related firms—and why we think they work best in combination with each other and commodity futures.

The views expressed herein do not constitute research, investment advice or trade recommendations and do not necessarily represent the views of all AllianceBernstein portfolio- management teams.

Seth Masters

Chief Investment Officer—Bernstein
Seth Masters is Chief Investment Officer of Bernstein. He heads the team that provides customized wealth-planning advice and manages the firm’s private client portfolios. Masters was previously CIO for Asset Allocation, overseeing the firm’s Dynamic Asset Allocation, Target Date, Target Risk and Indexed services. In June 2008, he was appointed head of AllianceBernstein’s newly formed Defined Contribution business unit, which has since become an industry leader in custom target-date and lifetime income portfolios. Masters became CIO of Blend Strategies in 2002 and launched a range of style-blended services. From 1994 to 2002, he was CIO of Emerging Markets Value Equities. He joined Bernstein in 1991 as a research analyst covering global financial firms. Masters has frequently been cited in print and appeared on television programs dealing with investment strategy. He has published numerous articles, including “The Case for the 20,000 Dow”; “Long-Horizon Investment Planning in Globally Integrated Capital Markets”; “Is There a Better Way to Rebalance?”; and “The Future of Defined Contribution Plans.” Masters worked as a senior associate at Booz, Allen & Hamilton from 1986 to 1990 and taught economics in China from 1983 to 1985. He holds an AB from Princeton University and an MPhil in economics from Oxford University. He is fluent in French and Mandarin Chinese. Location: New York

Jon Ruff, CFA

Lead Portfolio Manager and Director of Research—Real Asset Strategies
Jon Ruff joined the firm in 2004 as a senior portfolio manager, and was appointed a director of the Wealth Management Group in 2006 and Lead Portfolio Manager and Director of Research for the firm’s Real Asset Strategies division in 2010, working out of the San Francisco office. He previously served as the senior investment professional for a large family office. Before that, Ruff traded mortgage-backed bonds and monitored proprietary trading risk at Goldman Sachs in the US and Japan. He earned a BS in finance from the University of Virginia and an MBA from Northwestern University and is a CFA charterholder. Location: San Francisco

Related Posts